Eureka Energy's Board is Rejecting Aurora Oil & Gas' Offer

Eureka Energy Sugarloaf Map
Eureka Energy Sugarloaf Map

Eureka Energy is advising shareholders not to accept the US$110 million offer that was made for the company by Aurora Oil & Gas on Monday.

Eureka asserts the offer is lower than their valuation of the company's flagship asset in the Sugarloaf Field and does not attribute any value to its Pan De Azucar/Black Jack Springs, or Bioche assets.

Eureka owns a 6.25% working interest in 24,743 gross (1,521 net) acres operated by Marathon Oil in Karnes County. In U.S. dollars, the offer is for $0.46 per share and Eureka believes the Sugarloaf field alone is worth US$0.56 per share or US$132.7 million.

If I'm doing the math correctly, that's $132,700,000/1,521 net acres = a valuation of $87,245.23/acre.

Read the entire recommendation at eurekaenergy.com.au

Bee County Passes $9,500 Well Permit Fee to Fund Road Repairs

Bee County Commissioners passed a resolution that will require Eagle Ford oil & gas operators to pay a $9,500 fee for each approved well permit.  The fee will be contributed to the Bee County Road and Bridge Fund and will be used to make needed repairs in areas of high traffic. Road repairs can cost as much as $50,000 per mile. There are 18 approved permits, from five companies, in the northern area of the county that will be affected by the new fee. $171,000 will be raised almost immediately.

 

 

This is the first required fee I've seen, but I know I've seen talk of others. Use the comments below if you know of other counties with similar permit fees. In Dewitt County, one operator is voluntarily donating $8,000 to the road fund for every well it drills.

Eminent Domain Might Be Losing Power in Texas

Eminent domain in Texas might be redefined if a recent court ruling is upheld by higher courts. The court considered the remainder value of the Donnell's family lands in McMullen County, TX and not the pipeline right-of-way alone. The decision required the Eagle Ford pipeline company to compensate the family for depreciation of all lands.  That includes land not directly impacted by the pipeline. The family successfully argued that the land lost value due to its proximity to the pipeline. Essentially, they argued more than just the right-of-way was affected by the pipeline and additional compensation should be required. The pipeline company has been ordered to pay the family $600,000, but the decision will be challenged in higher courts before we get a final decision.

The question wasn't whether LaSalle Pipeline LP — which has the right of eminent domain — could lay a 16-inch, 52-mile pipeline that would cross two tracts of McMullen County land owned by Donnell Lands LP, a family partnership.

The biggest issue was whether the value of the rest of the ranchland would be affected by the pipeline's presence.

The company said no. But the landowners said yes, and a trial jury agreed with them to the tune of more than $600,000.

That decision has been winding its way through the Texas court system, and along with some legislative changes that went into effect in September, could represent a small step in giving landowners a larger voice in eminent domain battles.

Read more at mysanantonio.com

Lawsuits Over Mineral Rights on the Rise

Lawsuits over the nature of mineral leasing and the high stakes game of who owns and who leased first is a multi-million dollar issue in South Texas. Everyone sells land and leases minerals happily until acreage prices skyrocket. That's when the lawyers come out. That's when people realize they might have missed something very big. The gravy train of $10,000+ per acre lease bonuses and long lived royalties might have passed right by. Often times, real estate trades for fractions of the dollar before oil or gas is discovered. In a 1-2 year time period in Northern Louisiana, acreage prices in the Haynesville Shale increased from less than $3,000 an acre (that was good) to sell land and mineral rights to simply leasing minerals for as much as $20,000 per acre. Prices have come down, but the boom is much like what we'experiencing in the Eagle Ford.

The dollars involved also increase the likelihood of fraud. There will no doubt be bad apples, but companies do their due diligence on title and many of these issues are resolved before leasing. If you are leasing, always do research to make sure you're working with a reputable party.

A tangle of lawsuits has been filed over the disputed ownership of valuable mineral-rights leases in the booming Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, including allegations that the Fort Worth office of JPMorgan Chase & Co. wrongfully leased lands in Karnes and DeWitt counties.

In the DeWitt case, Orca Assets of Corpus Christi says it paid $3.2 million for a lease that the bank, acting for Fort Worth-based Red Crest Trust, had already sold to a rival drilling company.

Orca is on the other side of litigation in Karnes County, where it is a co-defendant with Chase and the trust.

Not too long ago, very few would care about those assets. But hydraulic fracturing technology has made Eagle Ford a hot drilling area. The San Antonio Express-News reported that mineral leases that fetched just a couple of hundred dollars less than a decade ago are now commanding $10,000 and more.